PDA

View Full Version : DOK: OSU’s new baby: Boone Pickens Stadium


snuffy
06-15-2009, 07:46 AM
OSU’s new baby: Boone Pickens Stadium
The Main Event: OSU's West End Zone
http://www.newsok.com/osus-stadium-renovations-its-not-your-fathers-lewis-field/article/3377908?custom_click=lead_story_title

By John Rohde
Published: June 15, 2009



Hiding underneath the west end zone of Boone Pickens Stadium are new digs for the football team and staff. Photo by Chris Landsberger, The Oklahoman

STILLWATER — When Bill Young arrived as a student at Oklahoma State in 1964, the seating capacity of Lewis Field was 39,000.

The facility hadn’t been expanded since 1950, and a dirt track circled the football field.

In one end zone, there were cedar trees and a scoreboard that was so bad "no high school would dare want it,” according to Young.

"The stadium looked like an erector’s set,” Young explained. "The old press box looked like it had come off a submarine or something.”

There was no weight room. Conditioning drills were conducted in the dirt basement of Gallagher Hall.

"You’d get down there on these hair mats and have your offseason program,” Young said. "You’d come out of there with dirt in your nose and in your eyes. It was just a dust storm down there whenever anybody started running. It was atrocious.”

On the plus side, with OSU being an agricultural school, the natural grass surface was immaculate. "The field was great,” Young said.

After stints as a player, a graduate assistant/junior varsity coach (1968-69) and offensive/defensive line coach (1976-78), Young is back for another stint inside the program, this time as defensive coordinator.

This OSU is nothing like the old OSU in terms of facilities.

Young hardly recognizes the place.

"It looks like they tore the old place down and built a new stadium,” Young said. "It’s hard to look out there right now and visualize what it could have looked like back when I played. It’s absolutely amazing what they’ve done facility-wise.”

Through the years, various Band-Aids were applied to Lewis Stadium to hide its wounds.

The most popular tale is paint being used to cover up the stadium’s rust.

Not so, said OSU athletic director Mike Holder, who arrived as a golfer in 1966 and has remained ever since.

"We didn’t even have enough money to buy paint to paint over the rust,” Holder said. "You had to look at it. That’s a vivid memory for me.”

What began as Athletic Field in 1913 and initially seated 8,000 fans in 1920, the same piece of property has now become 60,218-seat Boone Pickens Stadium, with $282 million of renovations on the verge of completion — $47 million for the stadium’s south side; $55 million for the north side; $180 million for the west end zone, video scoreboards, etc.

In the last two weeks, the team has moved into the training room, weight room, equipment room and dressing rooms. Next month, coaches will move into their offices.

Asked if new facilities could be heavily influential in recruiting, Young said: "Oh, there’s no question. It’s going to help us immensely. When you drive into Stillwater and see the facilities now compared to the erector set they had when I was here, it’s not even the same.

"We certainly are taking a huge, giant step, and we’re not stopping. We’re going to continue."

snuffy
06-15-2009, 07:49 AM
What they're saying: Boone Pickens Stadium
The Main Event: OSU's West End Zone
http://www.newsok.com/what-theyre-saying-boone-pickens-stadium/article/3377901?custom_click=headlines_widget

Published: June 15, 2009

West End Zone residents on what they like best about the new facility.


"My favorite part is the team room. The cushion on the seats and how laid back it is. It is not like the other team room. I can really spend time in there.”

— DeMarcus Conner, senior

"The hydra room. The versatility and adaptability of the pools — there are spa jets, swim jets, therapy jets.” — Rob Hunt, head athletic trainer

"The laundry facility. It will cut our laundry time at least in half, I would say. Also, the newness. Everything’s just so new.”

— Wes Edwards, equipment coordinator

"The proximity. I like that everything is so close together. Everything from the players and coaching staff and training table and weight room — everything that touches their life is within 100 yards, except housing and their classes. I also like the way it looks from the exterior.”

— Mike Holder, athletic director

"I like the fact that it is all under one roof and is all inclusive. We don’t have to make a big, long walk from the locker room to the weight room to the training room. It is like a nice hotel really. It is plush. Plush is the word”

— Andrew Mitchell, senior

"I was shocked. We have one of the best locker rooms in the country by far, hands down. It is top notch. We are on a different level now, and we just need to keep playing like it. If we play anything like our locker room looks, we are going to win championships.”

— Richetti Jones, sophomore

FalseGod
06-15-2009, 10:39 AM
The only thing I wish they would have put into the new stadium is grass. I think it would be perfect if they went back to the natural grass field.

76374_Poke
06-15-2009, 01:20 PM
The only thing I wish they would have put into the new stadium is grass. I think it would be perfect if they went back to the natural grass field.

I totally agree. I think it's time to go back to natural grass. It looks much nicer.

CaliforniaCowboy
06-15-2009, 01:27 PM
I don't understand the grass comments.

As we know, the coaches decided to keep this new stuff, and I can't think of any real advantage of grass. Some let it grow long when they have a run oriented team coming in, but as much as we run, that might backfire on us.

I think the turf looks better, since it doesn't get splotchy, worn down the middle, the lines don't have to be redrawn, etc. etc.

why grass?


(besides, how would we keep the Gooner cheerleaders from grazing?)

yeah, I know, it's an old one.

snuffy
06-15-2009, 02:08 PM
I have heard before that natural grass is not an option because of the East/West configuration and height of the south side. That both of these together keep the grass from growing. Does anyone know if it is true or was someone thinking out load?

FalseGod
06-15-2009, 03:31 PM
For me football just looks right played on grass. I don't care about the supposed speed argument because everyone is running on the same surface. If you are faster on turf, then so is the defense.

OSUFan
06-15-2009, 04:56 PM
Typical Dork article - most of the article talks about how ugly the stadium was and then four small paragraphs describe what it is now. sheesh

OKState918
06-15-2009, 08:02 PM
Typical Dork article - most of the article talks about how ugly the stadium was and then four small paragraphs describe what it is now. sheesh

I think that's the keyword there.

osupsycho
06-24-2009, 11:30 AM
The coaches and administrators have been quoted in the past saying that grass is not an option till we have an IPF and once we have that it will be decided what surface to do in the stadium. It was said that the amount of usage on the field without the IPF means a grass surface would not make it.

FalseGod
06-24-2009, 11:38 AM
That is fine, I just still think that it will not be perfect in my eyes until it has grass. Whether that ever happens I don't care.

wickerbill
06-24-2009, 12:07 PM
Not to mention, we're an ag school and have a plastic football field.

OSUFan
06-24-2009, 02:03 PM
Don't we still have a sprinkler system installed on the field and new drainage?

osupsycho
06-24-2009, 04:27 PM
Don't we still have a sprinkler system installed on the field and new drainage?

Yes there was drainage put in with the new field as it uses the drainage as well. I am seem to remember that there is sprinkler piping there as well but not sure on that.

Verb
06-24-2009, 05:02 PM
I believe they use sprinklers to cool the turf. I've also read that sprinklers help maintain the rubber fill.

OKState918
06-24-2009, 05:32 PM
I don't think it's out of the realm of feasibility - given that the drainage and sprinkler systems needed for one are already in place - to install a natural grass surface, but from everything I've heard, I don't think it's really something that the coaches are genuinely interested in (because if they were, you can bet we'd have one on the drawing board. Maybe not for next season or anything, but I guarantee it'd be on the to-do list).

To me, a grass field would be nice (from a fan's perspective - especially because I'm very much a traditionalist when it comes to football), but there's a lot of very legitimate reasons why an artificial surface is better.

For starters, studies have indicated that athletes are less prone to injury on modern artificial surfaces as opposed to natural grass. Cleats don't tend to get stuck as much, thus reducing the probability of ligament tears, and the surface gives more - thus reducing bone and joint stress.

Then there's the whole maintenance issue. I know a lot of people will be quick to point out that, as an agricultural school, maintaining a grass field shouldn't be a sweat for Oklahoma State, but the reality is that keeping the turf in good playing condition (i.e. trimming it, watering it, marking it, etc.) is pretty labor intensive and fairly costly.

Another thing is that with an artificial surface, you always know what you're going to get. The pile is always going to be the same, the resistance is always going to be the same, and the way players perform on it should always be roughly the same. In other words, if you're a coach, you're always going to know that Dez Bryant can run pretty consistent hitch route without fear of him slipping in a mudhole five-yards off the line of scrimmage, so from that standpoint, it helps with consistency.

Anyway. Just my two cents. I definitely wouldn't be opposed to seeing grass stains and cleat divots in Boone Pickens Stadium, but I certainly don't think it's one of those "if we don't have grass, we're falling behind the pack" kind of deals.

JimBob
06-24-2009, 09:10 PM
6/15 was Rhode's day under the UO desk; nice to see the hack being consistent.

pistolpete2002
06-25-2009, 11:38 AM
That's a good point about the injury issue Mike. I don't think Dez would have hurt himself in the Holiday Bowl game if it weren't for the bad grass field we played on.

GoPokes83
06-25-2009, 11:56 AM
Unpopular opinion but I wish it were named something else. (Like still Lewis Field) I know he ponied up for it but it just gives fodder to the detractors who already call us TBP University.

OKState918
06-25-2009, 03:30 PM
Unpopular opinion but I wish it were named something else. (Like still Lewis Field)

No, I don't think you're in the minority at all in saying you wished it had remained "Lewis Field", or at the very least, "Lewis Field at Boone Pickens Stadium".

Actually, I remember when they were in the process of renaming the stadium (2003-04 I believe) there was quite a bit of dissent amongst the student population, which kind of surprised me. I didn't know too many among my generation really cared about Laymon Lewis was, and honestly, many probably still don't know who he was. But, I think a lot of people recognized the history of the name.

Anyway. I personally would be all for it being called "Lewis Field", but it doesn't really tear me up to call it "The Boone", either.

snuffy
06-25-2009, 03:58 PM
No, I don't think you're in the minority at all in saying you wished it had remained "Lewis Field", or at the very least, "Lewis Field at Boone Pickens Stadium".

Actually, I remember when they were in the process of renaming the stadium (2003-04 I believe) there was quite a bit of dissent amongst the student population, which kind of surprised me. I didn't know too many among my generation really cared about Laymon Lewis was, and honestly, many probably still don't know who he was. But, I think a lot of people recognized the history of the name.

Anyway. I personally would be all for it being called "Lewis Field", but it doesn't really tear me up to call it "The Boone", either.

I know that SGA had naming rights to the entrance where the students go in and one senator was pushing to name it after LL Lewis. Last I heard the name had not been approved.