CFN ranks OSU OL #2

[Verb]

http://cfn.scout.com/2/781531.html

[MajorMike]

Wow.

[Erick]

Yo, that's in the UNIVERSE!

[wood911]

That's pretty amazing. it'll be fun to see how that much talent translates to games. This could be a great year if the defense improves just a little.

[WyomingOSUAlum]

http://newsok.com/osu-football-notebook-offensive-lines-depth-still-an-issue/article/3287015/?tm=1219372228



•O-line depth: The one area on the Oklahoma State depth chart that hasn't come as far as the rest of the team has been the offensive line. Gundy is comfortable with his starters, and junior-college transfer and Choctaw native Andrew Mitchell has provided immediate depth as a reserve tackle. But the rest of the backups are a work in progress.

"We're pretty solid at the tackle spot,” Gundy said. "I think (offensive line coach Joe Wickline) feels pretty good about having a third tackle and we're close to having a third guard.

"If so, we'll rotate some guys in. I'm sure he'll make that decision sometime next week.”

Russell Okung and Brady Bond are slated as the starting tackles, with Andrew Lewis and Steve Denning at the guard spots. David Washington is currently starting at center.

[OKState918]

Warpigs! Warpigs! Warpigs!

[osupsycho]

That is great and all but it still sucks that we get ranked as the second best in the land but WE ARE STILL BEHIND UO!!!!!!!!!!! :vomit-smiley-001:

[okstatepike]

That is great and all but it still sucks that we get ranked as the second best in the land but WE ARE STILL BEHIND UO!!!!!!!!!!! :vomit-smiley-001:

Ha ha! That is exactly what I thought....

[Poohness]

Methinks the writers for the Daily Oklahoman wouldn't know a great offensive line even if it knocked them twenty yards off of the ball and pile-drove them into the ground.

[MemphisPoke]

Methinks the writers for the Daily Oklahoman wouldn't know a great offensive line even if it knocked them twenty yards off of the ball and pile-drove them into the ground.


Well Pooh you made several mistakes in your post:

1) You called those people "writers" and we all know they are not. Homers for uO, yes, but writers they are not.

2) You insinuated that they would "know" something, or anything for that matter. I believe that over the years they have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they don't know come here from sic'em.

3) You referred to that rag as the Daily Oklahoman when we all know the name should be "the Joklahoman", a paper that comes out daily but should, because of the total news content they have, be published only on a weekly basis.

Other than those few errors I agree with you whole heartedly.

:D

[Poohness]

Memphis,
Ya know, you are absolutely right. I gave them way more credit than they deserved. I stand corrected. :D:pete: