FloridaPoke
09-27-2010, 12:06 PM
Total O Minus Total D in Yards.
1. aTm: 246 (Offense faced D's w average rank of 90th, Defense faced Offenses with average rank of 93rd.)
2. OSU: 222 (Offense faced D's w average rank of 113th, Defense faced Offenses with average rank of 36th (two top 15 Offenses).
3. NEB: 206
4. TEX: 129
5. MIZ: 111
6. BAY: 75
7. KAN: 45
8. KSU: 29
9. COL: 21
10. OU: 8
11.Tech: (15)
12. ISU: (58)
So, we have almost a 100 yard per game edge on aTm on O and the quality of Defenses we have faced are not significantly different. aTm has a 118 yard per game edge on Defense, yet the quality of Offenses we have faced is materially better.
1. aTm: 246 (Offense faced D's w average rank of 90th, Defense faced Offenses with average rank of 93rd.)
2. OSU: 222 (Offense faced D's w average rank of 113th, Defense faced Offenses with average rank of 36th (two top 15 Offenses).
3. NEB: 206
4. TEX: 129
5. MIZ: 111
6. BAY: 75
7. KAN: 45
8. KSU: 29
9. COL: 21
10. OU: 8
11.Tech: (15)
12. ISU: (58)
So, we have almost a 100 yard per game edge on aTm on O and the quality of Defenses we have faced are not significantly different. aTm has a 118 yard per game edge on Defense, yet the quality of Offenses we have faced is materially better.