PDA

View Full Version : TW - Union parent wants book off the shelves


Vulgar Display of Orange
01-27-2010, 06:20 AM
Union parent wants book off the shelves (http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=331&articleid=20100127_19_A1_Aparen780908)

By CLIFTON ADCOCK World Staff Writer
Published: 1/27/2010 2:24 AM
Last Modified: 1/27/2010 4:42 AM

The Union school board will decide Wednesday whether a children's book objected to by a parent will remain on the shelves of one of the district's elementary school libraries.

The issue comes before the board after a parent brought her concerns to the district's Materials Review Committee in October. The committee ultimately ruled that the book should be kept on library shelves.

Superintendent Cathy Burden said books' being brought before the board for review is a rare occurrence.

"I've been here 16 years, and we've never had a book reviewed by the board of education," she said.

The board could decide to keep the book on the shelves, remove the book or offer alternatives that could limit access to it.

The book in question is "Buster's Sugartime" by Marc Brown, an adaptation of an episode of the "Postcards from Buster" series that airs on PBS.

The episode was pulled from many PBS stations in early 2005 after controversy erupted because it showed two same-sex couples. "Sugartime," like other episodes from the series, is a combination of animated and live-action spots that feature Buster visiting children and their families with a wide range of backgrounds. In this particular episode, Buster visits Vermont during "Mud Season" to learn about the state and how maple syrup is made.

Most of the episode is devoted to Buster's following the children of a same-sex couple as they play, make cookies, visit a dairy, have dinner and make maple syrup.

Vermont was the first state to legalize same-sex civil unions in 2000 and legalized same-sex marriage last year.

The book is a condensed version of the episode. Of the story's 31 pages of text and pictures, two short passages mention the same-sex couple; one picture at the book's end features the two same-sex couples and their children together; and a drawn picture of one of the couples is in a scene's background.

The two passages state: "Buster went to visit his mom's friends Karen and Gillian. They had three children ..." and "Lily's moms, Tracy and Gina, were very good cooks."

According to the minutes of the school district's seven-person review committee's Oct. 29 meeting, the parent who filed the request for review said that on Sept. 2 her kindergarten-age son brought the book home from Thomas Jefferson Elementary School's media center.

Once the parent read the book, she said she and her husband thought the reference to "two moms" was appropriate for elementary-age children and that she thought it was the author's intent to expose children to same-sex marriage, according to the minutes.

The parent also told the group that "since Oklahoma law does not recognize same sex marriages, they (the parents) feel the subject matter is inappropriate for Jefferson media center," according to the documents.

After reviewing the case, the committee voted 6-1 to keep the book on the library shelves, citing the fact that several books in district libraries show different family structures and noting that children of same-sex parents who might relate to the book attend the district.

"The committee felt that it was the author's intent to expose different family structures. It was decided that the author was making a statement," the minutes state. "Maybe in Vermont, mud season, how maple syrup is tapped from trees and family structure of this type is accepted."

The school board will meet at 7 p.m. Wednesday at the Union Public Schools Education Service Center, 8506 E. 61st St.

**

I hope an angry mob shows up to the board meeting with torches and pitchforks a la Simpsons.

WyomingOSUAlum
01-27-2010, 08:02 AM
Are Karen and Gillian hot?

Vulgar Display of Orange
01-27-2010, 08:14 AM
Pretty hot for vegan terrorist witches.

bleedorange
01-27-2010, 08:16 AM
So it's a yes?

Vulgar Display of Orange
01-27-2010, 08:24 AM
On second thought...

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/buster_2.jpg

Talk to me after a few beers.

MemphisPoke
01-27-2010, 08:29 AM
Not that hot, Wyoming.


http://i109.photobucket.com/albums/n70/Albounds/buster_xlarge1.jpg

Moms along with their kids.

Vulgar Display of Orange
01-27-2010, 08:30 AM
They look pretty damaged.

bleedorange
01-27-2010, 08:31 AM
They look pretty damaged.

Years of softball and flannel shirts have ravaged them.

FalseGod
01-27-2010, 09:32 AM
OMGz, they will make my kidz0rs g4y!!!!!

Verb
01-27-2010, 09:35 AM
I hate freaking censorship.

Lewis the Pike
01-27-2010, 10:11 AM
I hate freaking censorship.

Agree with you, but I would make an exception for the Sports Animal and the Daily Oklahoman sports page.

Pokit N
01-27-2010, 10:42 AM
Years of softball and flannel shirts have ravaged them.

Look, some things in life are just funny and the above statement is one of them..

WyomingOSUAlum
01-27-2010, 11:33 AM
Yeah, I was thinking about maybe promoting their live webcam or something like that, but now, I don't think that's such a good idea.

WyomingOSUAlum
01-27-2010, 11:37 AM
On second thought...

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/buster_2.jpg

Talk to me after a few beers.




You're not talking about the bunny, are you? DON'T DO THE BUNNY !!!!!

Pokes4Life
01-27-2010, 12:18 PM
At least they didn't ban the dictionary:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,584010,00.html?test=latestnews

"California School District Bans Dictionary Over 'Oral Sex' Definition

A California school district has added a new book to the controversial list of literature that is considered unfit for young eyes.

It's the dictionary.

The Golden State's Menifee Union School District has yanked all copies of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary from its shelves and is investigating the classic American text for containing "age-inappropriate" words.

The trouble started when an inquisitive student got lost somewhere between "oralism" and "orang" and found a rather recent entry to the lexicon: "oral sex," a phrase that has been in common parlance since 1973 but still makes many parents fairly hot under the collar.

Menifee administrators chose to leave their lexicons languishing after a parent at Oak Meadows Elementary School complained about a child finding the definition, which reads, rather clinically: "oral stimulation of the genitals."

Now, more than 200 years after Noah Webster slashed the Us from British colours and honours in his very first American dictionary, this Riverside County school district 60 miles southeast of Los Angeles is looking to slash a little more.

Menifee, which is composed of 9,000 students between kindergarten and 8th grade, is forming a committee of principals, teachers and parents to pore over the book and determine whether it's fit for young eyes. It could take a while: the unabridged edition available online contains over 470,000 entries.

As they do their work, free speech advocates are getting worked up over what they call needless and harmful censorship.

"If a public school were to remove every book because it contains one word deemed objectionable to some parent, then there would be no books at all in our public libraries," said Peter Scheer, executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition, in an interview with the California Press-Enterprise.

"I think common sense seems to be lacking in this school."

What's more, the removal might deny bored children the centuries-old pastime of leafing through those tissue-thin pages for a brief glimpse of some otherwise unprintable slurs, the forbidden fruit of the reference section.

As anyone who went through sixth grade and spent a few minutes giggling in front of a dictionary probably knows, a------ is in there, and so is b----, and c---, and even d---. Merriam-Webster takes a breather at the letter e but picks up steam again with f--- and never looks back.

But some families are supporting the schools and say it's up to the district to do everything it can to shield children from explicit language.

Barbara Lassiter, whose 10-year-old granddaughter is a student at Oak Meadows, doesn't think officials need to read every entry in the book, but should field all complaints from parents and consider whether the dictionary is indeed appropriate.

"They're doing exactly the right thing," she told the Press-Enterprise.

The school might manage to trade its collegiate editions for a set targeted for younger audiences. Merriam-Webster also publishes a children's dictionary, which could help settle some nerves on both sides of the fight in Menifee.

In the meantime, the school district still has copies of dictionaries that aren't considered offensive, but remains in a bind over what to do with their Merriam-Websters, which are currently collecting dust — more than usual — out of reach of prying fingers.

One option they're not likely to consider is Merriam-Webster's interactive Visual Dictionary, which opens up for children a "visual world of information," and who knows how many more cans of worms?"

They did however, reverse their decision:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/01/27/national/a083401S04.DTL

"California school district ends dictionary ban

A California school district that pulled a dictionary from classrooms because it defined oral sex will allow it back on the shelves.

A committee of parents, teachers and administrators decided on Tuesday to permit fourth- and fifth-graders at Oak Meadows Elementary School in Menifee to use Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.

However, parents can opt to have their kids use an alternative dictionary.

The Riverside County district has 9,000 students and pulled the reference book last week after a parent complained about a child stumbling across the oral sex definition. That led to cries of censorship.

District policy called for setting up a committee to determine if the book was age-appropriate.

Menifee is about 80 miles southeast of Los Angeles."

Vulgar Display of Orange
01-27-2010, 01:37 PM
So....throwing a fit about it definitely made all of the kids in the district NOT want to look it up. Instead of suffering the 3 seconds of awkwardness when little Susie asks ___________ we go to the school board to have them pull a dictionary/children's book/whatever from the shelves. Who is the child here?

GoPokes83
01-27-2010, 02:30 PM
I have a ton of gay friends, (living in Austin it's inevitable) It's not like they're child molesters of ou fans. I don't have to understand it or for lack of a better word condone it to tolerate it in others. So why not let kids know it's out there. Then, when they stumble upon it in real life situations, (and they will) they'll be less likely to embarrass everyone involved, especially you. And isn't that the goal of every parent? Plus they'll be much less likely to climb a tower with a rifle and a chip on their shoulder that only return fire can knock off or in bedsheets burning a cross made out of those good two by fours you were saving in your scrap wood pile.

Vulgar Display of Orange
01-28-2010, 05:31 AM
Surprise, surprise, surprise.

http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=19&articleid=20100127_11_0_TheUni836789

Who was the -1? Get your shit together Tulsa/BA. Banning a book should never be considered by a school board member.