PDA

View Full Version : NPR: Fighting Gentrification With Money In Houston


Lewis the Pike
09-17-2009, 12:15 PM
NPR News Story CLICK HERE (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112888084&sc=fb&cc=fp)

Fighting Gentrification With Money In Houston
by Steve Inskeep


September 17, 2009
The skyscrapers of downtown Houston are plainly visible from the city's Third Ward.

That's why developers have begun building upscale townhomes here. It's central-city living, with an easy commute downtown. To an outsider, that construction may look like signs of revival in a run-down neighborhood.

State Rep. Garnet Coleman doesn't see it that way at all.

Coleman represents the Third Ward, much of which was historically a black section of segregated Houston.

Riding through the neighborhood, Coleman points out landmarks like Emancipation Park, established in 1918 — a legacy of a time when black residents needed a place of their own to enjoy the outdoors.

To Coleman, the addition of new townhomes and small gated enclaves does not look like progress.

"You displace people by price," Coleman said, "because their incomes are historically lower, if you're African-American."

Listing recent challenges that historically black neighborhoods such as New York City's Harlem, Washington, D.C.'s Shaw neighborhood and southwest Atlanta have faced, Coleman said, "I don't want somebody playing Monopoly with my neighborhood. I just don't think that I can stand for that."

Generations of African-Americans — whether laborers or doctors, maids or professors — lived in this area's wooden shotgun houses, long narrow homes designed to carry a breeze from room to room.

Coleman, the son of a Third Ward physician, is convinced that most of the residents of the new townhomes are likely to be affluent and white. And he was not ready for the poorer residents of this area, many of them renters, to be squeezed out.

"I'm an egalitarian like everybody else," Coleman said, "and talking about the racial aspect of this, or saying this is born of race, is not something I feel absolutely comfortable with."

He noted that places like Philadelphia have cordoned off sections of the city, to protect Independence Hall's historical importance from being diluted by modern development.

"Why isn't culture historical?" Coleman asked.

Although many of the wooden houses now sag on their foundation blocks, and even more houses have been torn down, Coleman is determined to preserve a black neighborhood.

He is hardly the first person who struggled to keep a treasured neighborhood from changing too much. What's different is that Coleman may have found a way to succeed — by competing against developers for ownership of the Third Ward's land.

As for anyone who moves into neighborhoods like the Third Ward — and integrates what had formerly been a segregated area — Coleman says the main problem often stems from the new arrivals' attitude.

"Don't come into the community, renovate your house and then act like the people that have been living there forever have no standing," Coleman said.

"If somebody's going to move into the Third Ward — I don't care who you are — just become a part of it."

--------------------------------------------------------------
Thoughts??

GoPokes83
09-17-2009, 12:34 PM
How is it that when a massive influx of African American moves into a neighborhood it's considered progress, but if it's whites moving into a predominantly Black neighborhood it's gentrification? Austin for example. East Austin was predominantly Black and Hispanic for generations. It was also one scary-assed place to be in certain areas. By far the worst crime in Austin. About 12 years ago white people figured out that those run down houses in bad neighborhoods were just a few blocks from the incredibly, INCREDIBLY overpriced older but fixed up neighborhoods that ring UT, the entertainment district and the Capitol areas. White people started moving into east Austin, buying up empty lots and renovating even the smallest, trashiest dump. Now the cries are out that gentrification has ruined the cultural history of East Austin. (Apparently Caucasian Americans have no cultural history to preserve when the demographics of what were predominantly white neighborhoods change.) Crime is still an issue, but it's dramatically down in those areas. Property values are through the freakin roof! I understand that this means property taxes are as well, but if you can sell a $20,000.00 shack you've done absolutely no repair on in 30 years for a half million or so because it's 6 blocks from the Capitol, then you should. You can move 20 blocks away and buy a damn fine home and dramatically change your families way of living with the excess $$$. I'm not saying that only white people can save old neighborhoods, that'd make me a racist. But the banks that wouldn't touch those slum neighborhoods a decade ago are more than willing to help the low income families with loans for improvement now that there's a reasonable certainty of a return on their investment. (i.e. it probably won't be turned into a crack house now.) Screw the term "gentrification". It should be called improvement.

Lewis the Pike
09-17-2009, 12:53 PM
Screw the term "gentrification". It should be called improvement.


Especially in your Austin example ;)